If you’re the first responder you respond to the project first. If you’re the notetaker, you’ll take notes during that person’s critique. Leave the notes on this document.
-communicating the man’s thoughts from the interview
-controversial person in china for things he did that upset the government officials
--he is banned from china and is making art and design in the US
-technology as very rigid while art is much more open and contains a lot of freedom
-- will artists still be able to be creative with the overwhelming technology
-why did you choose him for this project? after knowing his bground
--interesting contrast between him and the future and the thinking behind his ideas
--unsure of the connection between this man and what his background is(he has a huge negative connotation and this causes ambiguity since it’s just an excerpt of his interview)
-making a new project based on inspirations behind what he is saying?
-artistic statement about a scandal is interesting, but it might not be pushed the right way
-using the particular footage might not be appropriate
Open-ended feeling + level of mystery is interesting
Inspired by evolution + Darwinism
Future of art lies in hidden frequencies that humans cannot perceive yet
Doors = dimensions / gateways
may have been more effective to have doors represent each dimension in some way - ex: showing a 1-dimension door, a 2-D door, etc. rather than flipping between door and text
Info cards may not be“present” enough - may have been quicker + more effective to integrate them with first image that you see - information of the door feels lost when dimension name/icon appears
Good timing of text inserts
Typeface is formally interesting and expressive, but would also be nice to have a more conceptually intentional font - could also have more contrast between the two fonts - make type more legible
Overall: Concept is interesting, but could use some more consideration of graphics and typography
P1 Exhibition Critique