​​​🕘​ Meeting notes: RLS 1.0 + 2.0  branding/strategy

​​Apr 17, 2019

​​

​​Attendees

​​xanewok@gmail.com, Nicholas Matsakis, fklock@mozilla.com, aleksey.kladov@gmail.com, wilcokusee@gmail.com
​​

​​Agenda

  • ​​Should we create WG-RLS-1.0? Why (not)?
  • ​​What is the relation between RLS 1.0 and 2.0 and how it should be perceived?
  • ​​
​​

​​Discussion

  • ​​Key question: when do we expect RLS2 to be generally useful?
  • ​​Latency is the main pain point for RLS1.0, but there might be others
  • ​​Lack of manpower/initiative to support RLS 1.0 (also for 2.0, especially for design)
  • ​​Sharing/librafication might help against duplication of effort
  • ​​Possibility of creating a “1.0-2.0 bridge”
  • ​​Branding effects: RLS 2.0 is new and shiny, might distract contributors from RLS 1.0
​​

​​Action items

  • ​​Run a survey
  • ​​Consult with community team what data might be useful and how best to run the survey
​​