In our critique structure, there are three active roles: the presenter, the first responder(1r), and the notetaker(N).
If you’re the presenter, you’ll share your screen and walk us through your project. You’ll talk about your intentions, process, troubles, and design decisions. Once the presenter is done, the first responder will jump in and kick off our discussion. The notetaker will closely listen to the comments and take notes on this dropbox paper. The notetaker will summarize key findings so that we have an archival records, and so that the presenter can review the notes after they present, so they can focus on the discussion during their critique.
If you are marked as the“1r” you are the first responder. If you are marked“N” you are the notetaker and will take notes on this page.
Critique Order
Benjamin(1R Katie, N Rachel)
Katie(1R Rachel, N Erica)
Rachel(1R Erica, N Selina)
Erica(1R Selina, N Xin)
Selina(1R Xin, N Sonia)
Xin(1R Sonia, N Ki)
<break></break>
Sarah(1R Brynn, N Lauren)
Sonia(1R Ki, N Sarah)
Ki(1R Sarah, N Brynn)
Brynn(1R Lauren, N Victoria)
Lauren(1R Victoria, N Michelle)
Victoria(1R Michelle, N Benjamin)
Michelle(1R Benjamin, N Katie)
Notes
Place your URL after your name
Benjamin
Notes:
Still in development, about fictitious Ski team/resort(?)
scrolling page, lots of images, bold fonts, full page quotations
government page still in the works,‘sign me up’ page in development
Consistency, clean, quotes work well
Evolution of project, this is much more clear
Could improve on making the‘fiction’ come across?
What is this website for? What is it about? Layout clean and cohesive, idea needs to get across better
Maybe navigation in the beginning of page, guide the user more?
Critique Info
Critique Order
Notes
Benjamin
Katie https://shiakatie.github.io/fanpage-laoganma/